Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2227 WON YONG KIM, Debtor - Appellant, v. THOMAS PATRICK GORMAN, Trustee - Appellee, and JUDY A. ROBBINS, II, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00538-TSE-IDD; 16-10064- BFK) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2227 WON YONG KIM, Debtor - Appellant, v. THOMAS PATRICK GORMAN, Trustee - Appellee, and JUDY A. ROBBINS, II, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00538-TSE-IDD; 16-10064- BFK) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2227
WON YONG KIM,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS PATRICK GORMAN,
Trustee - Appellee,
and
JUDY A. ROBBINS, II,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00538-TSE-IDD; 16-10064-
BFK)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Won Yong Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Gorman, OFFICE OF THE
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Won Yong Kim appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from
the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of her Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. The district
court dismissed Kim’s appeal after she failed to timely file a designation of the record. See
Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009(a)(1). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order
and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); In
re SPR Corp.,
45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir. 1995); In re Serra Builders, Inc.,
970 F.2d 1309,
1311 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3