Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7591 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DILADE MCCOY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00044-REP-2) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dilade McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Ang
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7591 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DILADE MCCOY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00044-REP-2) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dilade McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Ange..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7591
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DILADE MCCOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00044-REP-2)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dilade McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States
Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dilade McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for
reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow,
844 F.3d 434, 437
(4th Cir. 2016) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. McCoy, No. 3:14-cr-00044-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 4,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2