Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sergei Freidzon v. Thomas Gorman, 16-1995 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-1995 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1995 In Re: SERGEI FREIDZON, Debtor. - SERGEI FREIDZON, Debtor – Appellant, v. THOMAS P. GORMAN, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00627-LMB-JFA; 14-13466- RGM) Submitted: April 20, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before KING, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1995 In Re: SERGEI FREIDZON, Debtor. ------------------------------------ SERGEI FREIDZON, Debtor – Appellant, v. THOMAS P. GORMAN, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00627-LMB-JFA; 14-13466- RGM) Submitted: April 20, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before KING, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sergei Freidzon, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas P. Gorman, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Sergei Freidzon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to vacate the voluntary dismissal of his Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Freidzon v. Gorman, No. 1:16-cv-00627-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed July 29, 2016 and entered Aug. 1, 2016). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Freidzon’s motions for appointment of counsel and for an interpreter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer