Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2258 NOEL A. DALE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC, a/k/a Time Warner Cable, Defendant – Appellee and TIME WARNER CABLE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00169-FL) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished p
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2258 NOEL A. DALE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC, a/k/a Time Warner Cable, Defendant – Appellee and TIME WARNER CABLE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00169-FL) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2258
NOEL A. DALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC, a/k/a Time Warner Cable,
Defendant – Appellee
and
TIME WARNER CABLE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00169-FL)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Noel A. Dale, Appellant Pro Se. Shalanna Lee Pirtle, Stacy Kaplan Wood, PARKER,
POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Noel A. Dale appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint brought under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e – 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Dale v. TWC Admin., LLC, No. 5:14-cv-00169-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3