Filed: Apr. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6283 ISRAEL BEN-LEVI, a/k/a Danny L. Loren, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KELLI HARRIS; JACKIE PARKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03125-BO) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Israel B
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6283 ISRAEL BEN-LEVI, a/k/a Danny L. Loren, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KELLI HARRIS; JACKIE PARKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03125-BO) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Israel Be..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6283
ISRAEL BEN-LEVI, a/k/a Danny L. Loren,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KELLI HARRIS; JACKIE PARKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03125-BO)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Israel Ben-Levi, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Israel Ben-Levi appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons
Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc-1 to 2000cc-5 (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ben-Levi v. Harris, No. 5:15-ct-03125-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2017). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2