Filed: May 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7291 LEONARD A. GIVENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID AARON; TIMOTHY REYNOLD; JOHN DOE 1-5; LOUIS GRIFFIN; JOHN HUNT; JAMES BIRD; MATTHEW BOONE; MANUEL ZACCHEUS, Defendants – Appellees, and DAVID R. MITCHELL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00378-FDW) Submitted: April 28, 2017 Decided: May 9,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7291 LEONARD A. GIVENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID AARON; TIMOTHY REYNOLD; JOHN DOE 1-5; LOUIS GRIFFIN; JOHN HUNT; JAMES BIRD; MATTHEW BOONE; MANUEL ZACCHEUS, Defendants – Appellees, and DAVID R. MITCHELL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00378-FDW) Submitted: April 28, 2017 Decided: May 9, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7291
LEONARD A. GIVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID AARON; TIMOTHY REYNOLD; JOHN DOE 1-5; LOUIS GRIFFIN;
JOHN HUNT; JAMES BIRD; MATTHEW BOONE; MANUEL ZACCHEUS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DAVID R. MITCHELL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00378-FDW)
Submitted: April 28, 2017 Decided: May 9, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard A. Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Leonard A. Givens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Aaron, No.
3:14-cv-00378-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2016). We deny Givens’ motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3