Filed: May 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1038 OLEG G. PODGORETSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01255-CMH-JFA) Submitted: May 11, 2017 Decided: May 19, 2017 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1038 OLEG G. PODGORETSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01255-CMH-JFA) Submitted: May 11, 2017 Decided: May 19, 2017 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1038 OLEG G. PODGORETSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01255-CMH-JFA) Submitted: May 11, 2017 Decided: May 19, 2017 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oleg G. Podgoretsky, Appellant Pro Se. Syed Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Oleg G. Podgoretsky appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Podgoretsky v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 1:16- cv-01255-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
