Filed: Jun. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6474 WILFREDO ANDUJAR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02126-FL) Submitted: May 30, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6474 WILFREDO ANDUJAR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02126-FL) Submitted: May 30, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wil..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6474
WILFREDO ANDUJAR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KENNY ATKINSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02126-FL)
Submitted: May 30, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilfredo Andujar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wilfredo Andujar, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Andujar leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andujar v. Atkinson, No.
5:14-hc-02126-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2