Filed: Jun. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARNOLDO AVITA GAMBOA, a/k/a Angel Martinez, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:08-cr-00151-2) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARNOLDO AVITA GAMBOA, a/k/a Angel Martinez, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:08-cr-00151-2) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARNOLDO AVITA GAMBOA, a/k/a Angel Martinez, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:08-cr-00151-2) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnoldo Avita Gamboa, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Joshua Clarke Hanks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Arnoldo Avita Gamboa appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gamboa, No. 2:08- cr-00151-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
