Filed: Jun. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6220 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, Sway, Defendant - Appellant No. 17-6221 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsb
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6220 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, Sway, Defendant - Appellant No. 17-6221 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsbu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio
Bady, Sway,
Defendant - Appellant
No. 17-6221
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio
Bady, a/k/a Sway,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-
cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United
States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions to reduce sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1;
3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3