Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1051 DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W. PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN) Submitted: Ju
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1051 DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W. PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN) Submitted: Jun..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1051
DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W.
PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and
Environmental Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: July 10, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Anthony Costa, Sara
Grossman Silverman, Assistant County Attorneys, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order dismissing their
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laux v. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfax
Cnty., No. 1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2