Filed: Jul. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6167 JAMAR A. CANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN; SERGEANT BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB) Submitted: June 22, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6167 JAMAR A. CANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN; SERGEANT BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB) Submitted: June 22, 201..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6167
JAMAR A. CANNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of
Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN;
SERGEANT BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: July 13, 2017
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamar A. Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Rodrigue Jurjevich, Jeff W. Rosen,
PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamar A. Cannon seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and
denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Cannon seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2