Filed: Jul. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6240 MICHAEL RAY JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01273-LMB-IDD) Submitted: June 28, 2017 Decided: July 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6240 MICHAEL RAY JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01273-LMB-IDD) Submitted: June 28, 2017 Decided: July 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6240
MICHAEL RAY JOHNSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ERIC D. WILSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01273-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: June 28, 2017 Decided: July 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly G. Ang, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Ray Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Wilson, No.
1:15-cv-01273-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2