Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6937 ALEXANDER JIGGETTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY SHERIFF; JAY FISHER, Baltimore County Circuit; COUNTY CLERK JULIE ENSOR; BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CHIEF JUDGE, Unknown Name, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01525-JFM) Submitted: November 20, 2017 Decided: November 28, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6937 ALEXANDER JIGGETTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY SHERIFF; JAY FISHER, Baltimore County Circuit; COUNTY CLERK JULIE ENSOR; BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CHIEF JUDGE, Unknown Name, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01525-JFM) Submitted: November 20, 2017 Decided: November 28, 201..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6937
ALEXANDER JIGGETTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY SHERIFF; JAY FISHER, Baltimore County Circuit;
COUNTY CLERK JULIE ENSOR; BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
CHIEF JUDGE, Unknown Name,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01525-JFM)
Submitted: November 20, 2017 Decided: November 28, 2017
Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Jiggetts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Jiggetts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Jiggetts v. Balt. Cty. Sheriff, No. 1:17-cv-01525-JFM (D. Md. June 30,
2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2