Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1517 DOMINANT INVESTMENTS 113, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03081-RDB) Submitted: November 30, 2017 Decided: December 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. Thom
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1517 DOMINANT INVESTMENTS 113, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03081-RDB) Submitted: November 30, 2017 Decided: December 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. Thoma..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1517
DOMINANT INVESTMENTS 113, LLC,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03081-RDB)
Submitted: November 30, 2017 Decided: December 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
C. Thomas Brown, SILVER & BROWN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Stacey A.
Moffet, ECCLESTON & WOLF, P.C., Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff Dominant Investments 113, LLC, appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant United States Liability Insurance Company on
Dominant’s claims for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith pursuant to
Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-1701 (West 2013). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Dominant Invs. 113, LLC v. U.S. Liab. Ins. Co., No. 1:16-cv-03081-RDB (D. Md.
Mar. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2