Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony Claytor v. Warden, 17-7106 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-7106 Visitors: 49
Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7106 ANTHONY J. CLAYTOR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI Hazelton-Med., Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00085-GMG-RWT) Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony J. Cla
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                        No. 17-7106


ANTHONY J. CLAYTOR,

                    Petitioner - Appellant,

             v.

WARDEN, FCI Hazelton-Med.,

                    Respondent - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00085-GMG-RWT)


Submitted: December 19, 2017                                Decided: December 22, 2017


Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Anthony J. Claytor, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Anthony J. Claytor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.       We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Claytor v. Warden, No. 3:17-cv-00085-

GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                              AFFIRMED




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer