Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7073 DEANDRE L’OVERTURE JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EARL BARKSDALE; M. YOUNCE; DAVID ZOOK; BRYANT, Sergeant; ADAMS, Officer; RICK WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (7:17-cv-00031-PMS) Submitted: December 29, 2017 Decided: January 5, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7073 DEANDRE L’OVERTURE JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EARL BARKSDALE; M. YOUNCE; DAVID ZOOK; BRYANT, Sergeant; ADAMS, Officer; RICK WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (7:17-cv-00031-PMS) Submitted: December 29, 2017 Decided: January 5, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7073
DEANDRE L’OVERTURE JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EARL BARKSDALE; M. YOUNCE; DAVID ZOOK; BRYANT, Sergeant;
ADAMS, Officer; RICK WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (7:17-cv-00031-PMS)
Submitted: December 29, 2017 Decided: January 5, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
DeAndre L’overture Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
DeAndre L’overture Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Jackson v. Barksdale, No. 7:17-cv-00031-PMS (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2017). We deny
Jackson’s motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2