Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7218 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VAGAS DAVIS, a/k/a Vegas Gabriel Davis, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cr-00309-HEH-1) Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 23, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7218 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VAGAS DAVIS, a/k/a Vegas Gabriel Davis, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cr-00309-HEH-1) Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 23, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7218
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VAGAS DAVIS, a/k/a Vegas Gabriel Davis,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cr-00309-HEH-1)
Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 23, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vagas Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vagas Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for
reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record
included on appeal and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 3:10-cr-
00309-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2