Filed: Jan. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1824 MELISSA DENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee, and MD SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-02446-DKC) Submitted: November 14, 2017 Decided: January 24, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1824 MELISSA DENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee, and MD SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-02446-DKC) Submitted: November 14, 2017 Decided: January 24, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1824 MELISSA DENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee, and MD SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-02446-DKC) Submitted: November 14, 2017 Decided: January 24, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melissa Dent, Appellant Pro Se. Constantine Alexander Hortis, Christopher Bowie Lord, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Melissa Dent appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Dent v. Univ. of Md., No. 8:16-cv-02446-DKC (D. Md. June 12, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
