Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Patrick Kelly v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 17-1843 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-1843 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1843 PATRICK J. KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES; ONEWEST BANK, N.A.; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR RESIDENTIAL ASSET SECURITIZATION TRUST 2007- A9 MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-I, Defendants - Appellees, and CARRIE M. WARD; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; JACOB GEESING; PRATIMA LELE; JOSHUA COLEMAN; RICHARD R. GOLDSMITH, JR.; LUDEEN MCCARTNEY-GR
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1843 PATRICK J. KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES; ONEWEST BANK, N.A.; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR RESIDENTIAL ASSET SECURITIZATION TRUST 2007- A9 MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-I, Defendants - Appellees, and CARRIE M. WARD; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; JACOB GEESING; PRATIMA LELE; JOSHUA COLEMAN; RICHARD R. GOLDSMITH, JR.; LUDEEN MCCARTNEY-GREEN; JASON KUTCHER; NICHOLAS DERDOCK; ELIZABETH C. JONES, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00039-GLR) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick J. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Win-Teh Chang, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Andrew Michael Williamson, BLANK ROME, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Patrick J. Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking a declaratory judgment that his loan with Defendant was rescinded by his notices sent to the lender. Because his action to enforce the rescission was not filed within the applicable time period, the district court dismissed the action as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00039- GLR (D. Md. June 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer