Filed: Feb. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7127 DERRICK D. BOGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROY COOPER, Governor; W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner of Prisons; GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons; SUSAN WHITE, Superintendent, Alexander Correctional, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00141-FDW) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decid
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7127 DERRICK D. BOGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROY COOPER, Governor; W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner of Prisons; GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons; SUSAN WHITE, Superintendent, Alexander Correctional, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00141-FDW) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decide..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7127
DERRICK D. BOGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROY COOPER, Governor; W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner of Prisons;
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons; SUSAN WHITE, Superintendent,
Alexander Correctional,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00141-FDW)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick D. Boger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derrick D. Boger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Boger v. Cooper, No. 5:17-cv-00141-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2