Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6783 GARY LEE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER J. AITA; SALISBURY CITY, Defendants - Appellees, and SALISBURY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC J. SANDER, #1122; PFC J. DIMARE; PFC J. BURT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (8:14-cv-03487-CCB) Submitted: January 31, 2018 Decided: February 14, 2018 Before AGEE, KEENAN, an
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6783 GARY LEE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER J. AITA; SALISBURY CITY, Defendants - Appellees, and SALISBURY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC J. SANDER, #1122; PFC J. DIMARE; PFC J. BURT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (8:14-cv-03487-CCB) Submitted: January 31, 2018 Decided: February 14, 2018 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6783
GARY LEE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER J. AITA; SALISBURY CITY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SALISBURY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC J. SANDER, #1122; PFC J.
DIMARE; PFC J. BURT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (8:14-cv-03487-CCB)
Submitted: January 31, 2018 Decided: February 14, 2018
Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ernest I. Cornbrooks IV, KARPINSKI, COLARESI
& KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing in part his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Smith v. Aita, No. 8:14-cv-03487-CCB (D. Md. July 12, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3