Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John Laschkewitsch v. Transamerica Life Insurance Co, 17-1950 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-1950 Visitors: 29
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1950 JOHN LASCHKEWITSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00632-D) Submitted: February 26, 2018 Decided: March 12, 2018 Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John B. La
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1950 JOHN LASCHKEWITSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00632-D) Submitted: February 26, 2018 Decided: March 12, 2018 Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John B. Laschkewitsch, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Marshall Jarrell, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; Misty A. Murray, HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John B. Laschkewitsch appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to compel arbitration, confirming the arbitrator’s award, and denying the motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laschkewitsch v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co., No. 5:14-cv-00632-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2015; Sept. 21, 2016; July 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer