Filed: Mar. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6475 STERLING L. SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICIA BROWN, Lieutenant, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02723-JMC) Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sterling L. Singleton, Appella
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6475 STERLING L. SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICIA BROWN, Lieutenant, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02723-JMC) Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sterling L. Singleton, Appellan..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6475
STERLING L. SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA BROWN, Lieutenant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02723-JMC)
Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sterling L. Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Michael Balthazor, Roy F. Laney, RILEY,
POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sterling L. Singleton appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Brown,
No. 9:15-cv-02723-JMC (D. S.C., Mar. 10, 2017). We deny Singleton’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2