Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tinika Warren v. Brad Tolbert, 17-2345 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2345 Visitors: 58
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2345 TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRAD TOLBERT, City of Greensboro, NC; TERRI JONES; MARK WAYMAN; DONALD FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-01401-TDS-JLW) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Seni
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2345 TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRAD TOLBERT, City of Greensboro, NC; TERRI JONES; MARK WAYMAN; DONALD FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-01401-TDS-JLW) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se. John Roseboro, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tinika S. Warren appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action challenging the City of Greensboro’s condemnation of property occupied by Warren. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Tolbert, No. 1:16-cv-01401-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2017). We deny Warren’s motion requesting certain documents and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer