Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2330 MS. RENEE (COG) FEREBEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EASTERN MOTORS DEALERSHIP, Defendant - Appellee, and MR. DALNI TAHRUI; MR. LEE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00165-PWG) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2330 MS. RENEE (COG) FEREBEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EASTERN MOTORS DEALERSHIP, Defendant - Appellee, and MR. DALNI TAHRUI; MR. LEE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00165-PWG) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpub..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2330
MS. RENEE (COG) FEREBEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EASTERN MOTORS DEALERSHIP,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MR. DALNI TAHRUI; MR. LEE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00165-PWG)
Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Renee Ferebee, Appellant Pro Se. Richard M. Sissman, FRACASSI MAHDAVI
SISSMAN & RAND LLP, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Renee (COG) Ferebee appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice
on res judicata grounds her civil action against Eastern Motors Dealership and two
individual Defendants. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ferebee’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Ferebee has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)
(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is
limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2