Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bruce Soloway v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage, 17-2153 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2153 Visitors: 31
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2153 BRUCE J. SOLOWAY; LORI A. BLOINK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Board of Directors; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Office of the Inspector General, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00254-CMH-JFA) Submitte
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2153 BRUCE J. SOLOWAY; LORI A. BLOINK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Board of Directors; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Office of the Inspector General, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00254-CMH-JFA) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce J. Soloway, Lori A. Bloink, Appellants Pro Se. Jessica Anne Clark, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Massie Payne Cooper, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Michael A. Johnson, ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bruce J. Soloway and Lori A. Bloink appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing their complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Soloway v. Federal Home Loan Mortg., No. 1:17-cv- 00254-CMH-JHA (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer