Filed: Apr. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7569 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANTHONY D. SEARLES, Doctor - Dept. of Public Safety; BELQUIS HOPKINS, Nurse - Dept. of Public Safety; DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent - Dept. of Public Safety, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00640-FDW) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7569 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANTHONY D. SEARLES, Doctor - Dept. of Public Safety; BELQUIS HOPKINS, Nurse - Dept. of Public Safety; DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent - Dept. of Public Safety, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00640-FDW) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7569 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANTHONY D. SEARLES, Doctor - Dept. of Public Safety; BELQUIS HOPKINS, Nurse - Dept. of Public Safety; DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent - Dept. of Public Safety, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00640-FDW) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his complaint without prejudice because it was duplicative of a pending complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Searles, No. 3:16-cv-00640-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
