Filed: Apr. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1044 JOSEPH PIRELA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA; ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN; THOMAS WILLIAMS; ALOYMA SANCHEZ; ERVIN GONZALEZ, Deceased; MERCEDES ALEMAN; CARLOS LARA; ETHIEL HERNANDEZ CLADERON; FREDDIE CRUZ, Miami Police Officers; MIAMI POLICE OFFICER ROBERTO; DENIS FONSECA, Miami Police Officer; MABEL FONSECA, Miami Police Officer; OLAIDA VILLALOBOS, Miami Police Officer; CARLOS ALVAREZ, Miami Police Officer; CH
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1044 JOSEPH PIRELA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA; ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN; THOMAS WILLIAMS; ALOYMA SANCHEZ; ERVIN GONZALEZ, Deceased; MERCEDES ALEMAN; CARLOS LARA; ETHIEL HERNANDEZ CLADERON; FREDDIE CRUZ, Miami Police Officers; MIAMI POLICE OFFICER ROBERTO; DENIS FONSECA, Miami Police Officer; MABEL FONSECA, Miami Police Officer; OLAIDA VILLALOBOS, Miami Police Officer; CARLOS ALVAREZ, Miami Police Officer; CHA..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1044
JOSEPH PIRELA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA; ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN; THOMAS WILLIAMS;
ALOYMA SANCHEZ; ERVIN GONZALEZ, Deceased; MERCEDES ALEMAN;
CARLOS LARA; ETHIEL HERNANDEZ CLADERON; FREDDIE CRUZ, Miami
Police Officers; MIAMI POLICE OFFICER ROBERTO; DENIS FONSECA,
Miami Police Officer; MABEL FONSECA, Miami Police Officer; OLAIDA
VILLALOBOS, Miami Police Officer; CARLOS ALVAREZ, Miami Police Officer;
CHARLES DAVID, Miami Police Officer; COUNTIN ANGEL MIRANDA, Miami
Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00480-D)
Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Pirela, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Pirela appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pirela v.
State of Florida, No. 5:17-cv-00480-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2