Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1090 MARK J. DUNCAN; IRIS S. DUNCAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY; ROBERT MCKINNEY; SARAH HUDSON; WALMART CORPORATION; GREGG BRADLEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01026-LCB-JEP) Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circui
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1090 MARK J. DUNCAN; IRIS S. DUNCAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY; ROBERT MCKINNEY; SARAH HUDSON; WALMART CORPORATION; GREGG BRADLEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01026-LCB-JEP) Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1090
MARK J. DUNCAN; IRIS S. DUNCAN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY; ROBERT MCKINNEY; SARAH HUDSON;
WALMART CORPORATION; GREGG BRADLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01026-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark J. Duncan and Iris S. Duncan, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark J. Duncan and Iris S. Duncan appeal the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Duncan v. McKinney, No. 1:17-cv-01026-LCB-JEP
(M.D.N.C., Jan. 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2