Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Syed Askri v. First Horizon Bank, 17-2409 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2409 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2409 SYED ASKRI, Debtor - Appellant, v. FIRST HORIZON BANK, Defendant - Appellee, and THOMAS P. GORMAN, Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00463-LMB-TCB; 1:17-cv- 00506-LMB-TCB) Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circui
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2409 SYED ASKRI, Debtor - Appellant, v. FIRST HORIZON BANK, Defendant - Appellee, and THOMAS P. GORMAN, Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00463-LMB-TCB; 1:17-cv- 00506-LMB-TCB) Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Syed Askri, Appellant Pro Se. Marcelo Ramiro Michel, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Syed Askri appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 proceeding and dismissing as moot his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting First Horizon Bank’s motion for relief from the automatic stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askri v. First Horizon Bank, Nos. 1:17-cv-00463-LMB-TCB; 1:17-cv-00506-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 8, 2017 & entered Nov. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer