Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thomas Figaniak v. Tyler Johnson, 17-2333 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2333 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2333 THOMAS G. FIGANIAK; VALERIE A. FIGANIAK, as Administrators of the Estate of Kevin Figaniak; Plaintiffs - Appellees, and CRAIG TYLER PEACOCK, individually; JARRETT CHANDLER, individually, Defendants - Appellees, v. TYLER JOHNSON, individually, Defendant - Appellant, and FRATERNAL ORDER OF OWL’S HOME NEST; LOYAL ORDER OF OWLS NEST LODGE 2558, d/b/a The Owls Nest, a West Virginia corporation; YE OLDE ALPHA, INC., a West V
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2333 THOMAS G. FIGANIAK; VALERIE A. FIGANIAK, as Administrators of the Estate of Kevin Figaniak; Plaintiffs - Appellees, and CRAIG TYLER PEACOCK, individually; JARRETT CHANDLER, individually, Defendants - Appellees, v. TYLER JOHNSON, individually, Defendant - Appellant, and FRATERNAL ORDER OF OWL’S HOME NEST; LOYAL ORDER OF OWLS NEST LODGE 2558, d/b/a The Owls Nest, a West Virginia corporation; YE OLDE ALPHA, INC., a West Virginia corporation, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00111-FPS) Submitted: July 31, 2018 Decided: August 9, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John J. Hare, Shane Haselbarth, MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Howard J. Bashman, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania; Jeffrey P. Goodman, SALTZ, MONGELUZZI, BARRETT & BENDESKY, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Guy R. Bucci, Ashley N. Lynch, HENDRICKSON AND LONG PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Defendant Tyler Johnson appeals the jury verdict finding him liable in tort to Plaintiffs Thomas and Valerie Figaniak for the death of their decedent, Kevin Figaniak, and the district court’s order denying Johnson’s posttrial motion for, inter alia, a new trial and for judgment as a matter of law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Figaniak v. Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00111-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer