Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6397 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISRAEL JIM ARTEAGA PAZ, a/k/a UM 33, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00332-NCT-12) Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6397 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISRAEL JIM ARTEAGA PAZ, a/k/a UM 33, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00332-NCT-12) Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed b..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6397
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ISRAEL JIM ARTEAGA PAZ, a/k/a UM 33,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00332-NCT-12)
Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Israel Jim Arteaga Paz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Israel Jim Arteaga Paz appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reduction in sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Paz, 1:10-cr-00332-NCT-12 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2018). We
deny Paz’s motion for a transcript at Government expense, and we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2