Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stephannie Javage v. General Motors LLC, 17-2091 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2091 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2091 STEPHANNIE JAVAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00082-GMG) Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: September 7, 2018 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2091 STEPHANNIE JAVAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00082-GMG) Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: September 7, 2018 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Brett Offutt, LAW OFFICE OF BRETT OFFUTT, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, for Appellant. Christopher C. Spencer, Mark C. Shuford, SPENCER SHUFORD LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stephannie Javage appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for failure to establish that the court had personal jurisdiction over General Motors LLC. We have reviewed the record provided on appeal and the arguments of the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Javage v. General Motors LLC, No. 3:17-cv-00082-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer