Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1593 RICHARD B. LAMB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN) Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1593 RICHARD B. LAMB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN) Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1593
RICHARD B. LAMB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE
FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN)
Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard B. Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard B. Lamb appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. SC Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, No. 0:18-cv-
00552-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2