Filed: Oct. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6499 ROBERT E. TIPPENS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C., Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00784-HEH-RCY) Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 17, 2018 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed b
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6499 ROBERT E. TIPPENS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C., Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00784-HEH-RCY) Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 17, 2018 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6499
ROBERT E. TIPPENS, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00784-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 17, 2018
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tippens v. Clarke, No. 3:17-cv-00784-
HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2