Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6597 JAMES S. FALLER, II, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENNIFER SAAD, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00048-IMK) Submitted: September 11, 2018 Decided: October 18, 2018 Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. James S. F
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6597 JAMES S. FALLER, II, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENNIFER SAAD, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00048-IMK) Submitted: September 11, 2018 Decided: October 18, 2018 Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. James S. Fa..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6597
JAMES S. FALLER, II,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JENNIFER SAAD,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00048-IMK)
Submitted: September 11, 2018 Decided: October 18, 2018
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James S. Faller, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James S. Faller, II, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Faller
has failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an
inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his detention. See Rice v.
Rivera,
617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 2010). The district court lacked jurisdiction over
Faller’s petition,
id., and we therefore grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, modify
the district court’s order, Faller v. Saad, No. 1:17-cv-00048-IMK (N.D.W. Va. May 10,
2018), to reflect a dismissal without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and affirm the
dismissal as modified, 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (2012). * We deny Faller’s motion to seal, but
order that the affiant’s name and identifying information be redacted from the
appendices. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
*
Faller has petitioned this court to hear this appeal en banc. The court denies the
petition. No judge requested a poll under Fed. R. App. P. 35 on the petition.
2