Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6938 OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MORRISON HEALTHCARE; THERESA DRUMMOND; BON SECOURS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:17-cv-01229-RBH) Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6938 OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MORRISON HEALTHCARE; THERESA DRUMMOND; BON SECOURS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:17-cv-01229-RBH) Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6938
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MORRISON HEALTHCARE; THERESA DRUMMOND; BON SECOURS
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:17-cv-01229-RBH)
Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Following remand from this court, the district court dismissed Olandio Ray
Workman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure to comply with a court order. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Morrison Healthcare,
No. 6:17-cv-01229-RBH (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2017; Jun. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2