Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6955 JR-GODFREY B. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BETH ARTHUR; J. BARRETT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00716-LO-IDD) Submitted: November 20, 2018 Decided: November 26, 2018 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. JR-Godfrey B. Walker, Ap
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6955 JR-GODFREY B. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BETH ARTHUR; J. BARRETT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00716-LO-IDD) Submitted: November 20, 2018 Decided: November 26, 2018 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. JR-Godfrey B. Walker, App..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6955
JR-GODFREY B. WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BETH ARTHUR; J. BARRETT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00716-LO-IDD)
Submitted: November 20, 2018 Decided: November 26, 2018
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
JR-Godfrey B. Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
JR-Godfrey B. Walker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walker v.
Arthur, No. 1:18-cv-00716-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. July 3, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2