UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7474 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARRY D. HILL, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (4:13-cr-00028-BR-1) Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry D. Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry D. Hill, Jr., appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to amend his presentence report. Hill offered nothing in his motion for reconsideration to undermine the district court’s conclusion that the proposed amendment does not qualify as a correction of a clerical error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. And, contrary to his assertion on appeal, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) has no application in a criminal case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Hill, No. 4:13-cr-00028-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2