Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7291 RODERICK DEMAIN GATLING-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MELISSA KENNEDY, Durham Police Department; NATE PARKER, Durham Police Department; TIM JOHNSON, Durham Police Department; J. CARL HUSKETH, Durham Police Department; J.J. CARTWRIGHT, Durham Police Department; SET TEAM, Durham Police Department; JEFFREY LUX; JAMES DORNFRIED, Durham County ADA; JUDGE KENNETH C. TITUS; ERIK A. HOOKS; SUPERINTENDENT SAPPER, Bertie Correc
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7291 RODERICK DEMAIN GATLING-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MELISSA KENNEDY, Durham Police Department; NATE PARKER, Durham Police Department; TIM JOHNSON, Durham Police Department; J. CARL HUSKETH, Durham Police Department; J.J. CARTWRIGHT, Durham Police Department; SET TEAM, Durham Police Department; JEFFREY LUX; JAMES DORNFRIED, Durham County ADA; JUDGE KENNETH C. TITUS; ERIK A. HOOKS; SUPERINTENDENT SAPPER, Bertie Correct..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7291
RODERICK DEMAIN GATLING-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MELISSA KENNEDY, Durham Police Department; NATE PARKER, Durham
Police Department; TIM JOHNSON, Durham Police Department; J. CARL
HUSKETH, Durham Police Department; J.J. CARTWRIGHT, Durham Police
Department; SET TEAM, Durham Police Department; JEFFREY LUX; JAMES
DORNFRIED, Durham County ADA; JUDGE KENNETH C. TITUS; ERIK A.
HOOKS; SUPERINTENDENT SAPPER, Bertie Correctional,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03043-D)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Demain Gatling-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Demain Gatling-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
§ 1983 action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (b) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gatling-Bey’s
motion to enforce subrogation rights and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gatling-Bey v. Kennedy, No. 5:18-ct-03043-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2