Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1688 JEAN BWEJERI; GODEBERTHE WAKANA; ARISTIDE RUTANGINGANJI; SYLVIA MAIRA HAYINKA; M.J.B., Petitioners, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: February 19, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019 Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David G
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1688 JEAN BWEJERI; GODEBERTHE WAKANA; ARISTIDE RUTANGINGANJI; SYLVIA MAIRA HAYINKA; M.J.B., Petitioners, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: February 19, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019 Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Go..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1688
JEAN BWEJERI; GODEBERTHE WAKANA; ARISTIDE RUTANGINGANJI;
SYLVIA MAIRA HAYINKA; M.J.B.,
Petitioners,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 19, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019
Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Goren, GOREN & BARRETO, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioners.
Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Nancy E. Friedman, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Sharon M. Clay, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil
Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jean Bwejeri, a native of Burundi and a citizen of Belgium, and his family
members included in his applications for relief, petition for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Bwejeri’s motion to reconsider. We
have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b)(1) (2018). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Bwejeri
(B.I.A. May 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2