Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2284 ALETA MACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CGI FEDERAL INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00297-TSE-MSN) Submitted: March 18, 2019 Decided: March 27, 2019 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aleta Mack, Appellant Pro Se. R
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2284 ALETA MACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CGI FEDERAL INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00297-TSE-MSN) Submitted: March 18, 2019 Decided: March 27, 2019 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aleta Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Ri..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2284 ALETA MACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CGI FEDERAL INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00297-TSE-MSN) Submitted: March 18, 2019 Decided: March 27, 2019 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aleta Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Dare, Vienna, Virginia, Alison D. Kewer, ISLER DARE, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aleta Mack appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her former employer on her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. CGI Fed. Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00297-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
