Filed: Apr. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN LAVOUR TWITTY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:98-cr-00826-CMC-1; 0:15-cv-02797-CMC) Submitted: March 21, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN LAVOUR TWITTY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:98-cr-00826-CMC-1; 0:15-cv-02797-CMC) Submitted: March 21, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7297
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN LAVOUR TWITTY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:98-cr-00826-CMC-1;
0:15-cv-02797-CMC)
Submitted: March 21, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel C. Leonardi, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL
PUBLIC DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Sherri A. Lydon,
United States Attorney, Kathleen Michelle Stoughton, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Lavour Twitty appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2012) motion as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Twitty, Nos. 0:98-cr-00826-CMC-1; 0:15-cv-02797-CMC (D.S.C.
Nov. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2