Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Elsie Marino v. Jeffrey Nadel, 18-2283 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-2283 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2283 ELSIE MARINO, Consumer, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFREY NADEL, doing business as Law Offices of Jeffrey Nadel; SCOTT E. NADEL; DANIEL MENCHEL; MICHAEL MCKEOWN; CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-1, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-021
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2283 ELSIE MARINO, Consumer, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFREY NADEL, doing business as Law Offices of Jeffrey Nadel; SCOTT E. NADEL; DANIEL MENCHEL; MICHAEL MCKEOWN; CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-1, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02116-GJH) Submitted: March 11, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elsie Marino, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, BEIRAMEE LAW GROUP, P.C., Bethesda, Maryland; Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Elsie Marino appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marino v. Nadel, No. 8:17-cv-02116-GJH (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer