Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

William Grant, II v. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 18-2399 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-2399 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2399 WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01328-LO-IDD) Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opi
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 18-2399


WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF,

                    Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01328-LO-IDD)


Submitted: April 4, 2019                                          Decided: April 8, 2019


Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.


Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.


William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      William Lee Grant, II, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 
337 U.S. 541
, 545-46 (1949). Because it is possible that Grant could cure the

defects in his complaint through amendment, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va.

Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 
807 F.3d 619
, 623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with

instructions to allow Grant to file an amended complaint.        We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED AND REMANDED




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer