Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ryan Baxter Burns v. Monica Hogge, 18-1748 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-1748 Visitors: 53
Filed: Jun. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1748 RYAN BAXTER BURNS, Administrator of the Estate of William Lewis Burns, Jr., Defendant - Appellant, v. MONICA HOGGE, Defendant - Appellee, FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01383-TSE-TCB) Submitted: April 23, 2019 Decided: June 14, 2019 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circ
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1748 RYAN BAXTER BURNS, Administrator of the Estate of William Lewis Burns, Jr., Defendant - Appellant, v. MONICA HOGGE, Defendant - Appellee, FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01383-TSE-TCB) Submitted: April 23, 2019 Decided: June 14, 2019 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George O. Peterson, Tania M. L. Saylor, PETERSON SAYLOR, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark E. Kellogg, BECKER, KELLOGG & BERRY, PC, Springfield, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Ryan Baxter Burns, as administrator of the estate of William Lewis Burns, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Monica Hogge, in this interpleader action brought to determine the rights to the funds in the decedent’s individual retirement account. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Hogge, No. 1:17-cv-01383-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. filed June 4, 2018; entered June 5, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer