Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Kenneth Legrand, 19-6250 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-6250 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND, a/k/a Kenneth Orlando Scott, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 19-6250


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND, a/k/a Kenneth Orlando Scott,

                    Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1)


Submitted: June 20, 2019                                          Decided: June 25, 2019


Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Kenneth Orlando Legrand, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Kenneth Orlando Legrand appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the

Sentencing Guidelines. On appeal, Legrand disputes the court’s decision not to grant an

even greater reduction. However, we have reviewed the record and discern no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Legrand, No. 2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2019). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                               AFFIRMED




                                             2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer