Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6370 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SCOTT WILSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00036-RDB-1) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6370 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SCOTT WILSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00036-RDB-1) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6370 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SCOTT WILSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00036-RDB-1) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Scott Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 1:09-cr- 00036-RDB-1 (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2019). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Wilson’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
