Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6378 DONALD E. GRIFFIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALICE MASICO; AARON JOYNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:17-cv-02852-DCC) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr.,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6378 DONALD E. GRIFFIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALICE MASICO; AARON JOYNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:17-cv-02852-DCC) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6378
DONALD E. GRIFFIN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALICE MASICO; AARON JOYNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:17-cv-02852-DCC)
Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX
BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald E. Griffin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants
in Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Griffin v. Masico, No. 0:17-cv-02852-DCC (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2019). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2